E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS







There was an error processing this request. We cannot subscribe you to newsletters at this time. Please contact technical support with details.
Featured Sponsors
Blogs Sponsorship

About Regis Nicoll

Regis Nicoll is a Centurion of Prison Fellowship Ministries Wilberforce Forum. After a 30-year career as a nuclear specialist, Regis became a freelance writer who writes on current cultural issues from a Christian perspective. His work regularly appears on BreakPoint online and the Crux Project among other places. Regis also teaches and speaks on a variety of worldview topics, covering everything from Sharing the Gospel in a Postmodern Generation to String Theory. As a men's ministry leader in his community, Regis also conducts seminars for the spiritual development of men.

Search The Bible   
Advanced Search
<< >>

Regis Nicoll

Freelance Writer, Speaker, Worldview Teacher, Men's Ministry Leader

  • Saturday, August 2, 2008
    Darwinianity

    Fishkiss For the past six years, pastor-turned-evangelist Rev. Michael Dowd has been going from pulpit to pulpit preaching the gospel—no, not the good news of our salvation through Jesus Christ, but of our liberation and empowerment through Charles Darwin.

    How’s that? The good Reverend explains:

    “[Darwin gives us] a far more empirical way of talking about human nature than through stories like the original sin.”

    As the New York Times's Yudhijit Bhattacharjee writes, “It explains our frailties, our addictions, our infidelities and other moral deficiencies as byproducts of adaptation over billions of years. And that, [Dowd] says, has a potentially liberating effect: never mind guilt; once we understand our sinful ways, we can get past them and play a conscious role in the evolution of humanity.”

    Consider Bob Miller, an octogenarian whose string of infidelities, decades ago, led to a divorce, just as he was ascending the corporate ladder. For years Miller struggled to understand his behavior and the forces behind it. Then, a Dowd crusade came to Miller’s church.

    There, the Reverend “explained” the evolutionary origin human behavior, and “Eureka!”: Miller realized that the culprit for his failures was not a fallen nature, but elevated testosterone, brought on by his corporate success.

    With the burden of guilt gone, Miller reflects: “I think the physical change in my body was so strong that it completely overpowered any moral teachings and religious beliefs I had.”

    There you have it--the science is in! It is not from the heart that evil thoughts, murder, adultery, and sexual immorality come; it’s from a physical law working on our chemistry. Feeling better now?

    Now Michael Dowd is hawking his new book Thank God for Evolution with “Facts are God’s native tongue.” That’s a good catchphrase! Indeed, facts are God’s native tongue; facts like:

    • Darwinian evolution has never been observed or reproduced even in micro-organisms whose explosive rates of replication would guarantee its validity.
    • Based on a random, unguided process, Darwinian evolution has no predictive power. Consequently, Darwinian evolution has not contributed to a single technological or medical advance since it was conjectured 150 years ago.
    • Information, like that found in DNA, is empirically known to originate only from intelligent causes.
    • There has been insufficient time for the simplest gene, much less the simplest organism, to develop from an unintelligent process, even given all the necessary chemical ingredients.
    • And then there's the fact of entropy, the universal law of physics that causes systems to go from bad to worse, unless affected by a rational application of energy.

    But somehow I doubt that you’ll find those facts in Thank God for Evolution. Some you will find, according to the author, are “many of the core doctrines central to Christianity—sin, salvation, the kingdom of God, heaven and hell, Jesus as God's way, truth, and life,” unpacked in “an undeniably this-world realistic—way.”

    Dowd represents this, pictorially, with a logo on the van he and his wife use in their “outreach.” It shows two fish kissing: one labeled “Jesus” and the other, “Darwin.”

    Dowd calls his theological perspective “creatheistic.”

    Would that be “cre-atheistic?” That seems right, considering his wife, whom he describes as his “mission partner," is an atheist.

    What do you think of Darwinianity? Post your comments here.

    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss
  • Tuesday, July 29, 2008
    A World without Truth...

    ...is "No Country for Old Men." Or from Kant to Chigurh in  two easy steps.

    Post your comments here.

    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss
  • Thursday, July 10, 2008
    Taking the Steam Out of Global Warming
    What to do about the impending global meltdown?

    Under the Creation Mandate, efforts to conserve natural resources, optimize energy use and efficiency, recycle, and reduce consumption and consumerism are examples of faithful stewardship. Problem is, say global warming alarmists, such voluntary measures are not sufficient to avert our cataclysmic inferno. Maybe that’s why An Inconvenient Truth pitchman, Al Gore, has not seen fit to reduce the energy consumption of his own residence, which is using 10 percent more energy than a year ago, enough to supply the energy needs of nearly 20 average homes.

    What is needed, according to the climate change party line, are governmentally enforced controls like the Kyoto Treaty. But whether or not forced restrictions such as Kyoto are demanded by principles of Christian stewardship really depends on the answers to six questions:

    Is the earth warming?
    Is warming an overall bad thing?
    Is human activity the primary cause?
    Would forced standards sufficiently reduce global temperatures?
    Would they be cost-effective?
    Would forced standards not create more—or more severe—problems than they solve?

    Click here for the "answers." Then post your thoughts here.

    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss
  • The Passover Plot, Gospel of Judas, and the Jesus Ossuary follow 2000 years of attempts to undermine the pillars of the Christian faith: the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Now, the "Gabriel Revelation" can be added to the mix.

    What is the Gabriel Revelation? It is a text, written on a stone tablet in the first century B.C., that purportedly refers to a suffering messiah that will die and rise again.

    To Christian critics like Israel Knohl, the tablet confirms the theory that a suffering messiah was an established part of Jewish tradition well before the appearance of Jesus. Well, yeah: Genesis 3:15, Psalm 22, Isaiah 52 and 53 and Daniel 9:26 tell us as much, so what’s new?

    According to the decipherers, the tablet refers to a messianic figure who is told he will be slain and “in three days you will live.”  Such detail, it is argued, means that the Gospel writers penned this prediction in their narratives after the fact. Except that, as I have commented, the Gospels were “written within the lifetime of eyewitnesses, [so that] any fabrication on the part of authors to fudge the facts would have been readily contested by any number of hostile contemporaries.”

    So why that added detail should raise eyebrows is more than a little perplexing, considering that there are hundreds of prophecies about Jesus recorded in the Old Testament centuries before His birth, the most astonishing being the precise year of His triumphal entry into Jerusalem predicted by Daniel (chapter 9:25-26) 300 years prior.

    Nevertheless, for the better part of two centuries, critics have been citing myths of Olympian deities impregnating human women to sire half-gods, and dying and rising Corn-Kings, as proof that the Christian narrative is one of human invention. C. S. Lewis saw it differently.

    To Lewis, myth at its best is a penumbra of divine light that inspires the human imagination about the true nature of things—much of which is stamped onto the design of nature. 

    Myths about the Corn-King abound because of the natural pattern of life, death and new life which presages the “real Corn-King who will die once and rise once at Jerusalem.” Lewis writes, “We pass from a Balder or an Osiris, dying nobody knows when or where, to a historical person…under Pontius Pilate.”  He concludes, “We must not be nervous about ‘parallels’ and ‘pagan Christs’: they ought to be there—it would be a stumbling block if they weren’t.”

    In the same way, myths -- in the sense of what Lewis might call "true myths," or general revelations -- like those that appear to be contained in the Gabriel Revelation, "ought to be there," as we get closer and closer in time to the "myth that became fact."

    What do you think about the "Gabriel Revelation? Click here and post your comments.

     

    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss

  • "...the mystery of God, namely, Christ, in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge."
    (Colossians 2:2-3)

    MAN OR MYTH?

    Two thousand years ago, Jesus challenged his disciples with, “Who do you say that I am?” It was a haunting question because the possible answers were few. His contemporaries accused him of being a deluded babbler, knowing fraud or demon-possessed lackey. Some accepted him as a great moral teacher, and a few, the Lord he claimed to be. Today, the expanse of intervening time has led some to another conclusion.

    In an open online exchange, I used a version of C.S. Lewis’ Liar, Lunatic, Lord trilemma to establish the divinity of Jesus. One participant countered, “That’s well and fine, but for the fact that there is no reliable record that Jesus actually lived.”

    “Come again?”

    “Jesus goes completely under the radar of the Roman records, the Palestinian historians—everyone!”

    He was referring to the “Jesus myth”—a claim that the Jesus of the Bible never existed. Although it has charmed skeptics since it was originally trotted out in the 19th century, today no reputable scholar supports the Jesus myth, for several reasons:

    • First, there are the extra-biblical references to Jesus by Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny, and Suetonious—men who weren’t particularly inclined toward this messianic figure or His fringe following.
    • Next, there is the emergence of a Christian community within the living memory of Jesus’ contemporaries. Modern naysayers would have us accept that this community endured persecution for a fictitious character whose existence could have been checked out from any number of surviving eyewitnesses.
    • Finally, there is the historical record of the Bible itself: Namely, that Jesus was a Jew who lived in first-century Palestine; He was executed on the order of Pontius Pilate; and after His death His disciples began saying He had risen from the dead.

    Consequently, even some not-so-sympathetic authorities dismiss the myth theory. For instance, atheist and historian Michael Grant cedes, "Modern critical methods fail to support the Christ-myth theory. . . . It has again and again been answered and annihilated by first-rank scholars."

    Considering the remaining options, the one that best fits the facts is the one reached by the apostle Thomas: "My Lord and my God!"

    Saul of Tarsus, a Jewish zealot and Christian persecutor, came to the same conclusion on a dusty trail to Damascus. He eventually described Jesus as “the image of the invisible God,” in whom “all the fullness of the Godhead resides in bodily form.”

    The earthly invasion of Jesus—the “Incarnate Word”—was an event that all of history had built up to.

    THE INCARNATE WORD

    In the period prior to the Incarnation, mankind was aware of three things: a spiritual realm that was pure and unchanging; a material world that was corrupt and fleeting; and the infinite gulf between them. Therein lay a problem.

    For pre-Christian people, God was a distant and impersonal deity whose true identity and desires were largely unknowable. Anxious about relying on personal guesswork to forge the divine divide, people looked to enlightened go-betweens. The proliferation of temples, priests, and priestesses over the ages was a response to man’s felt need for mediation.

    When the Incarnate Word broke into history, He was unlike all the mediators that had gone before. They were human; He was human and divine. He was the perfect bridge over the gaping chasm between the earthly and the heavenly—a priest who not only intercedes for man, but who reveals God to man. As the apostle John wrote, “No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, who is at the Father's side, has made him known” (John 1:18).

    Of all places, it was in a cave that the “One and Only” first made him known.

    CUT INTO A HILLSIDE

    Caves were shelters for animals, lepers, and refugees. Darkness, and the threats of disease and physical danger, made them undesirable habitats for all but those on the margins.

    The cave was also a metaphor for the material world—the impermanent, corrupted “shadow” of reality, a thing to be despised. If man was to learn the true nature of things, he must turn his attention from the cave to the heavens—the pure and unchanging realm of Being.

    In time, a Persian coterie left the cave and followed the heavens until they landed on the outskirts of Bethlehem. There, G. K. Chesterton notes, they came upon a cave cut into the side of a hill, where a young mother was caring for her newborn.

    Never could they have imagined what lay at their journey’s end: a refuge for outcasts, where an impoverished couple was attending a suckling infant, wrapped in strips of cloth, and resting in a feeding trough.

    Neither could they have processed the reality before their eyes: “A child who was a father and a mother who was a child.” Yet, in some inexplicable way, they sensed that, in this humble scene, Truth was not outside the cave but inside it. For those who had been studying the matter, the time for “God with us” had come and with that, a divine statement about the world had been made.

    Although spoiled by the effects of sin, the material world is not a loathsome object corrupted beyond repair. It is a creation loved by its Creator who entered, by way of a cave, in the flesh and form of a human infant to restore it and make himself known.

    OUT OF THE CAVE

    Through his healing touch, comforting words, and heart-piercing stories, Jesus revealed God to people restless for transcendence. Teaching moments were reinforced by life example:

    • He, who taught the greatness of servanthood, left the head of the table to take up the towel and basin.
    • He, who taught his disciples to pray, withdrew to a mountainside, a garden, and quiet places to talk with the Father.
    • He, who taught his followers to take up their cross, took up his on the Golgothan hill.
    • He, who on another hill taught the crowd to love their enemies, pleaded for his, “Father, forgive them.”

    From the cave to the cross, Jesus modeled his greatest commandment; “As I have loved you, so you must love.” (John 13:34-35) Enduring the panorama of our misery, Jesus experienced temptation, pain, and rejection beyond human comprehension, before laying down his life that we might enjoy eternal fellowship with him.

    The Incarnate Word is evidence that God not only exists and loves us, but identifies with us. When asked, “When did we see you, Lord,” he will reply, “When I was hungry, naked, sick . . . ” Jesus is evidence that God identifies with cave-dwellers.

    A cave also marks the other end of his life. It was the site of something so startling, it shook a group of seasoned soldiers to their core.

    THE OTHER CAVE

    After Jesus’ body was removed from the cross, Joseph of Arimathea laid it in a tomb cut out of rock. As an infant, Mary had swathed his wriggling body in strips of linen. Now Joseph wrapped his lifeless corpse in a cloth loaded with spices.

    The next morning when the women visited the tomb, they found a highly-disciplined Roman detachment rattled to the point of paralysis. Maybe it was the earthquake, or the spectral figure that rolled back the stone sealing the entrance. Or maybe it was what Peter and John saw after they stooped to peer inside.

    It has been oft-claimed that the resurrection of Jesus rests on the empty tomb; it does not. An empty tomb could be dismissed as the result of theft, or of returning to the wrong tomb. This tomb was not empty; it held something that established the resurrection beyond all rational argument.

    On the slab were burial wrappings that no longer contained a body. The grave clothes were not littered about the tomb willy-nilly; they were altogether, in a piece, conformed in the shape of a human body, but collapsed, like a cocoon whose contents had vaporized and oozed out through its fibers.

    To men who had not understood that their leader must die, much less rise from the dead, the sight of the crumpled “chrysalis” was a faith-galvanizing moment. It prompted reflection on all they had been taught, including the ultimate revelation of their Master,

    “Because I live, you also will live. On that day you will realize that I am in the Father, and you are in me, and I am in you” (John 14:19-20).

    • Email
    • Print
    • Discuss